Regulation Works?

Congress, The White House, and The Media all seem to agree that the answer to the question, “What went wrong?” appears to be that we did not have enough regulation, that the system (whatever that is) was not protected successfully enough from the BAD ACTORS, i.e. bankers, Wall Street, borrowers, car manufacturing executives, derivative traders, hedge fund managers, insurance companies, etc. An apparent chorus of the elected and those wishing they were in power (journalists) all agree that we need more regulation of commerce to prevent another breakdown of the system (whatever that is).

Before going further, let me suggest that you can not sell securities, make loans, finance cars, offer insurance, or manage individuals’ money unless the federal government (or state in which you wish to do business) says you can, period. Anyone who does, has the federal government’s or respective state governments’ specific and acknowledged permission to do so.

I offer that one reason that the system (whatever that is) experienced a breakdown is not from too little regulation, but from the false sense of security created by too much.

I have asked myself many times, who (because the system is us) gives all of his or her net worth to some fellow with out anything more than his figurative hand-written receipt? Is it possible that investors trusted Bernie with the dough because he could claim that he was being regulated (watched) by FINRA, the Federal Government (SEC) and every state securities commissioner in the nation? I think that smart, rich people were lulled into a false sense of security knowing that someone else was looking after their best interest.

Likewise, what prospective homeowner (because the system is us) agrees to repay more money than he or she will make in a lifetime of working? Our banks and lenders are heavily regulated. If they are willing to lend (or purchase my mortgage), it must be ok. Where is the regulator when you have to show your bad credit to the system?

Perhaps the system would be more guarded and careful with its money and its credit if the system did not know deep in its hearts that the federal and state governments have everything under control and are there to keep us from harm. Does it ring true that more of the same is the solution?

Leave a Reply

What I'm Doing...
Interesting Articles
  • The Aphorism Drive

    Here is a truism, if not an aphorism. Without death and the certainty of physical finitude, Homo sapiens would never have left the cave. Unhappiness and uncertainty — rather than happiness and certitude — are what get us off our duffs.

    No misery. No Sistine Chapel.

    So what happens to the creative spirit when government steps in to soothe our anxieties? Without unhappiness, what happens to culture? Without adversity, what happens to motivation? Parents know. Suffice to say, the work ethic is not strong among the coddled.

    Most important, with all needs met, what happens to freedom — that human recoil against imposed order?”
    by Kathleen Parker
  • Freedom Means Responsibility


    Nearly 16 years ago in these very pages, I wrote that "'one-size-fits all' rules for business ignore the reality of the market place." Today I'm watching some broad rules evolve on individual decisions that are even worse.


    by George McGovern Wall Street Journal
  • Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal'


    John Maynard Keynes was twitted with changing his mind. He replied, "When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"”
    by David Mamet Village Voice
Login



Wise Words
Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have...a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean the characters and conduct of their rulers.
by John Adams
CIRCLE Gear
Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales