Posts Tagged ‘bailouts’

Let the Dinosaur Die

I just don’t understand this need to prop up the media organizations with federal assistance.  Some fear that we will see the industry drop in numbers and that this will, in some way, limit our freedom of speech.  So, their answer?  Let’s get the government involved!  Yup, that will cure our ills and make speech even more free and opinions much more diverse.

The WSJ has an opinion piece on why we should protect these large dinosaurs.  I have some questions.  First,  aren’t we there already? AP, NewsCorp, ABC, …  Last time I checked, most news articles that are in print or on air are produced by a select few global news organizations.  So, any government involvement will not be to prevent the pool from getting smaller, it will be in protecting the small number we already have.  And, if you are going to be one of the select few chosen to survive with the assistance of federal monies, it is only logical that the federal government get to make up some of the rules on fairness and accuracy, no?  They want that in Healthcare, Auto Bailout, and in the Financial Reform Act, so why not here,also?  Oh, but the feds will need to lean on the expertise of the industry (those select few that have the ability to spend on lobbyists) to craft the new rules.  And the cycle goes until federal help turns into a federally-endorsed oligopoly on news outlets.  Step by step, inch by inch…

So, more questions;

  • If there is little demand for the traditional media model (large global news orgs), does it not suggest that the traditional model is less useful?
  • Technology has done a good job of making very local (and diverse) journalist capable of being global in their distribution channel. Why fight it?
  • Why is there this inherent need for everything to be run by a select few large organizations when the purpose for their size (economies of scale in distribution) is no longer required?

This all screams to me as being a type of nostalgia.  What seems to be lost on many is that business models exist to solve a particular problem, fill a particular need.  If that need or problem is no longer a need or problem, why would we want to protect that business model?  Unless you want control…

What I'm Doing...
Interesting Articles
  • Everyone Should Pay Income Taxes


    If you thought Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme was bad, wait until you hear about the inverted pyramid scheme the federal government is working on. While Mr. Madoff preyed on people who trusted him with their money, the federal government has everyone's money, and the implications of its actions are worse.”
    by Ari Fleischer Wall Street Journal
  • Economic Freedom Is Still the Best Policy


    It is said that the only thing that people learn from history is that people learn nothing from history. Looking at how the world is handling the current economic crisis, this aphorism appears sadly true.”
    by Mart Laar Wall Street Journal Europe
  • A Capitalist Manifesto

    Where are the champions of free-market capitalism? Someone needs to remind us all that two great works were published in 1776, both representing game-changing advances in human freedom: The Declaration of Independence, authored by future American president, Thomas Jefferson, and "The Wealth of Nations" by Scottish economist Adam Smith. Both embrace the social wisdom of individual liberty; both extol the importance of personal responsibility.”
    by Judy Shelton Wall Street Journal
Login



Wise Words
You can't have it both ways. You can't have both free will and a benevolent higher power who protects you from yourself.
by Arthur C. Clarke
CIRCLE Gear
Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales